|
The History of Ancient Sumeria (Sumer) including its cities, kings, religions culture and contributions or civilization Topics First Historical Personalities Sumerian Writings The Art of Sumeria by: Liliana Osses Adams Other Mesopotamian Peoples
Map
Ziggurat Ziggurat
Please Help Keep Us On the Web. We are a Non-Profit Organization and the cost of continuing is becoming more than we can handle. Therefore, we are asking you to please donate anything you can to help keep us on the web Care to express an opinion on a current or past historical event? Need to ask a question from our many visitors? Just visit our Message Board and leave your message. |
Sumerian and Akkadian Myths Myths The Akkadian myths are in many ways
dependent on Sumerian materials, but they show originality and a broader
scope in their treatment of the earlier Sumerian concepts and forms; they
address themselves more often to existence as a whole. Fairly close to
Sumerian prototypes is an Akkadian version of the myth of "Nana’s
Descent." An Old Babylonian myth about the Thunderbird Ansud, who stole
the tablets of fates and was conquered by Ninurta, who was guided by
Enki's counsel, is probably closely related to the Sumerian story of
Ninurta's contest with Enki. Also important is an Old Babylonian
"Myth of Atrahasis," which, in motif, shows a relationship with the
account of the creation of man to relieve the gods of toil in the "Enki
and Ninmah" myth, and with a Sumerian account of the Flood in the "Eridu
Genesis." The Atrahasis myth, however, treats these themes with noticeable
originality and remarkable depth. It relates, first, how the gods
originally had to toil for a living, how they rebelled and went on strike,
how Enki suggested that one of their number--the god We, apparently the
ringleader who "had the idea"--be killed and mankind created from clay
mixed with his flesh and blood, so that the toil of the gods could be laid
on man and the gods left to go free. But after Enki and the birth goddess
Nintur (another name for Ninmah) had created man, man multiplied at such a
rate that the din he made kept Enlil sleepless. At first Enlil had Namtar,
the god of death, cause a plague to diminish mankind's numbers, but the
wise Atrahasis, at the advice of Enki, had man concentrate all worship and
offerings on Namtar. Namtar, embarrassed at hurting people who showed such
love and affection for him, stayed his hand. Next Enlil had Adad, the god
of rains, hold back the rains and thus cause a famine, but, because of the
same stratagem, Adad was embarrassed and released the rains. After this,
Enlil planned a famine by divine group action that would not be vulnerable
as the earlier actions by individual gods had been. Anu and Adad were to
guard the heavens, he himself earth, and Enki the waters underground and
the sea so that no gift of nature could come through to man. The ensuing
famine was terrible. By the seventh year one house consumed the other and
people began eating their own children. At that point Enki--accidentally
he maintained--let through a wealth of fish from the sea and so saved man.
With this, however, Enlil's patience was at an end and he thought of the
Flood as a means to get rid of humanity once and for all. Enki, however,
warned Atrahasis and had him build a boat in which he saved himself, his
family, and all animals. After the flood had abated and the ship was
grounded, Atrahasis sacrificed, and the hungry gods, much chastened,
gathered around the offering. Only Enlil was unrelenting until Enki
upbraided him for killing innocent and guilty alike and--there is a gap in
the text--suggested other means to keep human numbers down. In
consultation with the birth goddess Nintur, Enki then developed a scheme
of birth control by inventing the barren woman, the demon Pashittu who
kills children at birth, and the various classes of priestesses to whom
giving birth was taboo. The myth uses the motif of the protest
of the gods against their hard toil and the creation of man to relieve it,
which was depicted earlier in the Sumerian myth of "Enki and Ninmah," and
also the motif of the Flood, which occurred in the "Eridu Genesis." The
import of these motifs here is, however, new: they bring out the basic
precariousness of man's existence; man's usefulness to the gods will not
protect him unless he takes care not to annoy them, however innocently. He
must stay within bounds; there are limits set for his self-expression. A far more trustful and committed
attitude toward the powers that rule existence finds expression in the
seemingly slightly later Babylonian creation story, Enuma elish, which may
be dated to the later part of the 1st dynasty of Babylon (c. 1894-c. 1595
BC). Babylon's archenemy at that time was the Sealand, which controlled
Nippur and the country south of it--the ancestral country of Sumerian
civilization. This lends political point to the battle of Marduk (thunder
and rain deity), the god of Babylon, with the Sea, Tiamat; it also
accounts for the odd, almost complete silence about Enlil of Nippur in the
tale. The myth tells how in the beginning
there was nothing but Apsu, the sweet waters underground, and Tiamat, the
sea, mingling their waters together. In these waters the first gods came
into being, and generation followed generation. The gods represented
energy and activity and thus differed markedly from Apsu and Tiamat, who
stood for rest and inertia. True to their nature the gods gathered to
dance, and in so doing, surging back and forth, they disturbed the insides
of Tiamat. Finally, Apsu's patience was at an end, and he thought of doing
away with the gods, but Tiamat, as a true mother, demurred at destroying
her own offspring. Apsu, however, did not swerve from his decision, and he
was encouraged in this by his page Mummu, "the original (watery) form."
When the youngest of the gods, the clever Ea (Sumerian Enki), heard about
the planned attack he forestalled it by means of a powerful spell with
which he poured slumber on Apsu, killed him, and built his temple over
him. He seized Mummu and held him captive by a nose rope. In the temple thus built the hero of
the myth, Marduk, was born. From the first he was the darling of his
grandfather, the god of heaven, Anu, who engendered the four winds for him
to play with. As they blew and churned up waves, the disturbing of Tiamat--and
of a faction of the gods who shared her desire for rest--became more and
more unbearable. At last these gods succeeded in rousing her to
resistance, and she created a mighty army with a spearhead of monsters to
destroy the gods. She placed her consort Kingu ("Task[?]") at the head of
it and gave him absolute powers. When news of these developments
reached the gods there was consternation. Ea was sent to make Tiamat
desist, and then Anu, but to no avail. Finally Anshar, god of the horizon
and king of the gods, thought of young Marduk. Marduk proved willing to
fight Tiamat but demanded absolute authority. Accordingly, a messenger was
sent to the oldest of the gods, Lahmu and Lahamu ("Silt[?]"), to call the
gods to assembly, and in the assembly the gods conferred absolute
authority on Marduk, tested it by seeing whether his word of command alone
could destroy a constellation and then again make it whole, hailed him
king, and set him on the road of "security and obedience," a formula of
allegiance that based his power and authority on the pressing need for
protection of the moment. In the ensuing encounter with Tiamat's
forces Kingu and his army lost heart when they saw Marduk. Only Tiamat
stood her ground, seeking first to throw him off his guard by flattery
about his quick rise to leadership, but Marduk angrily denounced her and
the older generation: "The sons (had to) withdraw (for) the fathers were
acting treacherously, and (now) you, who gave birth to them, bear malice
to the offspring." At this Tiamat, furious, attacked, but Marduk loosed
the winds against her, pierced her heart with an arrow, and killed her.
Kingu and the gods who had sided with her he took captive. Having thus won a lasting victory for
his suzerain, King Anshar, he gave thought to what he might do further.
Cleaving the carcass of Tiamat, he raised half of her to form heaven,
ordered the constellations, the calendar, the movements of Sun and Moon,
and, keeping control of atmospheric phenomena for himself, made the Earth
out of the other half of her, arranging its mountains and rivers. Having
organized the various administrative tasks, he put their supervision in
Ea's hands; to Anu he gave the tablets of fate he had taken from Kingu.
His prisoners he paraded in triumphal procession before his fathers, and
as a monument to his victory he set up images of Tiamat's monsters at the
gate of his parental home. The gods were overjoyed to see him; Anshar
rushed toward him and Marduk formally announced to him the state of
security he had achieved. He then bathed, dressed, and seated himself on
his throne, with the spear "Security and Obedience," named from his
mandate, at his side. By now, however, the situation had subtly altered.
The old fear and urgent need for protection was gone, but in its stead had
come a promise held out by Marduk's organizational powers; so when the
gods reaffirmed their allegiance to him as king they used a new formula:
"benefits and obedience." From then on Marduk would take care of their
sanctuaries and they, in turn, would obey him. Marduk then announced his intention of
building a city for himself, Babylon, with room for the gods when they
come there for assembly. His fathers suggested that they move to Babylon
themselves to be with him and help in the administration of the world he
had created. Next, he pardoned the gods who had sided with Tiamat and had
been captured, charging them with the building tasks. Grateful for their
lives, they prostrated themselves before him, hailed him as king, and
promised to do the building. Pleased with their willingness, Marduk
magnanimously wanted to relieve them even from this chore and planned to
create man to do the toil for them. At the advice of his father Ea, he
then had them indict Kingu as instigator of the rebellion. Kingu was duly
sentenced and executed, and from his blood Ea created man. Then Marduk
divided the gods into a celestial and a terrestrial group, assigned them
their tasks in the cosmos, and allotted them their stipends. Thus freed
from all burdens, the gods wanted to show their gratitude to Marduk, and
as a token they took, of their own free will, for one last time, spade in
hand to build Babylon and Marduk's temple Esagila. In the new temple the
gods then assembled and distributed the celestial and terrestrial offices.
The "great gods" went into session and permanently appointed the "seven
gods of destinies," or better "of the decrees," who would formulate in
final form the decrees enacted by the assembly. Marduk then presented his
weapons, and Anu adopted the bow as his daughter and gave it a seat among
the gods. Lastly, Marduk was enthroned, and after the gods had prostrated
themselves before him they bound themselves by oath--touching their
throats with oil and water--and formally gave him kingship, appointing him
permanently lord of the gods of heaven and earth. After this they solemnly
named his 50 names expressive of his power and achievements. The myth ends
with a plea that it be handed on from father to son and told to future
rulers, that they may heed Marduk: it is the song of Marduk who bound
Tiamat and assumed the kingship. The motifs from which this myth is
built up are in large measure known from elsewhere. The initial generation
of the gods is a variant form of the genealogy of Anu in the great god
list An: Anum. The threat to annihilate the disturbers of sleep are known
from the Atrahasis and the Sumerian Flood traditions. The battle of Marduk
with Tiamat seems to stem from western myths of a battle between the
thunder god and the sea. The organization of the universe after victory
recalls the organization of conquered territory in Lugal-e. The killing of
a rebel god to create man to take over the gods' toil is found in the
Atrahasis myth and--without the rebel aspect--in a bilingual creation myth
found in Assur. New and original, however, is the way in which they have
all been grouped and made dependent on the figure of the young king. The
political form of the monarchy is seen as embracing the universe; it was
the prowess of a young king that overcame the forces of inertia; it was
his organizational genius that created and organized all; and it is he
that--like his counterpart on earth, the human king--grants benefits in
return for obedience. The high value set on the monarchy as
a guarantor of security and order in the Enuma elish can hardly have
seemed obvious in Babylonia in the first troubled years of Assyrian rule
in the second quarter of the 1st millennium BC. From this period (c. 700
BC) comes a myth usually called the Erra epic, which reads almost like a
polemic against Enuma elish. It tells how the god of affray and
indiscriminate slaughter, Erra, persuaded Marduk to turn over the rule of
the world to him while Marduk was having his royal insignia cleaned, and
how Erra, true to his nature, used his powers to institute indiscriminate
rioting and slaughter. Royal power here stands no longer for security and
order but for the opposite: license to kill and destroy. Two other Akkadian myths may be
mentioned--both probably dating from the middle of the 2nd millennium--the
myth of the "Dynasty of Dunnum" and the myth of "Nergal and Ereshkigal."
The first of these tells of succeeding divine generations ruling in Dunnum,
the son usually killing his father and marrying, sometimes his mother,
sometimes his sister, until--according to a reconstruction of the broken
text--more acceptable mores came into vogue with the last generation of
gods, Enlil and Ninurta. This myth, as has been mentioned, underlies the
Greek poet Hesiod's Theogony. The myth of Nergal and Ereshkigal relates
the unorthodox way in which the god Nergal became the husband of
Ereshkigal and king of the netherworld. Epics The quick rise of Sargon, the founder
of the dynasty of Akkad (c. 2334-c. 2154 BC), from obscurity to fame and
his victory over Lugalzagesi of Uruk form the theme of several epic tales.
The sudden eclipse of the Akkadian empire long after Naram-Sin, which was
wrongly attributed to that ruler's presumed pride and the gods'
retaliation, is the theme of "The Fall of Akkad." Akkadian epic tradition
continues and gives focus to the Sumerian tales of Gilgamesh. The Akkadian epic of Gilgamesh seems
to have been composed in Old Babylonian times but was reworked by a
certain Sin-leqe-unnini later in the 1st millennium BC. It tells how
Gilgamesh, the young ruler of Uruk, drives his subjects so hard that they
appeal to the gods for relief. The gods create a wild man, Enkidu, who at
first lives with the animals in the desert but is lured away from them and
becomes Gilgamesh's friend. Together they vanquish the terrifying Huwawa,
set by Enlil to guard the cedar forest in the West, and, when on their
return the goddess of Uruk, Ishtar, falls in love with Gilgamesh, is
jilted by him, and sends the dread "bull of heaven" to kill him, he and
Enkidu manage to kill the bull. At this point, however, their fortunes
change. Enlil, angered at the killing of Huwawa, causes Enkidu to fall ill
and die, and Gilgamesh, inconsolable at the death of his friend and
terrified at the realization that he himself must someday die, sets out to
find eternal life. After many adventures he reaches his
ancestor Utnapishtim, to whom the gods have granted eternal life, but his
case proves to be a unique one and so of no help to Gilgamesh. Utnapishtim
was rewarded for having saved human and animal life at the time of the
great Flood. Eventually, just as Gilgamesh is ready to return home, he is
told about a plant that rejuvenates and makes old men children again.
Gilgamesh finds it and begins his return journey. But, as the day is warm,
when he passes an inviting pool he leaves his clothes and the plant on the
shore and goes in for a swim. A serpent smells the plant, comes out of its
hole, and eats it. Thus Gilgamesh's quest comes to naught. Eternal life is
beyond man's grasp. The Gilgamesh epic is perhaps the most moving work in
ancient Mesopotamian literature, with its sharp contrast of values: the
warrior's disdain of death and danger, which informs the early parts of
the epic, and the haunting fear that drives Gilgamesh in the later parts. Other Akkadian epics that deserve to
be mentioned are the Etana epic, which tells how Etana, the first king,
was carried up to heaven on the back of an eagle to obtain the plant of
birth so that his son could be born. Also important are the epic tales
about Sargon of Akkad, one of which, the birth legend, tells of his
abandonment in a casket on the river by his mother--much as the Bible
tells that Moses was abandoned--and his discovery by an orchardman, who
raised him as his son. Another Sargon tale is "The King of Battle," which
tells about conquests in Asia Minor to protect foreign trade. Naram-Sin is
the central figure in another tale dealing with that king's pride and also
relating the destructive invasions by barbarous foes. A late flowering of
primary epic is the Assyrian Tukulti-Ninurta (reigned 1243-07 BC) epic
that deals with that king's wars with Babylonia. The Mesopotamian
worldview as expressed in myth The more completely a given culture is
embraced, the more natural will its basic tenets seem to the people
involved. The most fundamental of its presuppositions are not even likely
to rise into awareness and be consciously held but are tacitly taken for
granted. It takes a degree of cultural decline, of the loosening of the
culture's grip on thought and action, before its most basic structural
lines can be recognized and, if need be, challenged. Since culture, the
total pattern within which man lives and acts, is thus not likely to be
conceived of consciously and as a whole until it begins to lose its
obvious and natural character, it is understandable that those myths of a
culture that may be termed existential--in the sense that they articulate
human existence as a whole in terms of the culture and show its basic
structure--are rarely encountered until comparatively late in the history
of a culture. Before that occurs, it is, rather, the particular aspects
and facets of existence that are apt to claim attention. In ancient Mesopotamia the oldest
known materials, the Sumerian myths, have relatively little to say about
creation; scholars must, for the most part, turn to the introductions of
tales and disputations to infer how things were believed to be in the
beginning. Thus, a story about the hero Gilgamesh refers in its
introductory lines to the times "after heaven had been moved away from
earth, after earth had been separated from heaven." The same notion that
heaven and earth were once close together occurs also in a bilingual
Sumero-Akkadian text from Ashur about the creation of man. The actual act
of separating them is credited to the storm god Enlil of Nippur in the
introduction to a third tale that deals with the creation of the first
hoe. From similar passing remarks scholars have inferred that the gods,
before man came into being, had to labor hard at the heavy works of
irrigation agriculture and dug out the beds of the Tigris and the
Euphrates. Main Page |