Americas
On The Eve Of Invasion
Author: Michael Schwartz
Date: 1992
Back To Main Alamo Page
Post classical Mesoamerica, A.D. 1000-1500
The collapse of Teotihuacan
in central Mexico and the abandonment of the
classical Maya cities in the 8th century A.D. signaled a significant
political
and cultural change in Mesoamerica. The civilizations that followed
built on
the achievements of their classic predecessors but rarely surpassed
them,
except in the area of political and military organization.
In central Mexico, nomadic peoples from beyond the northern frontier
of
the sedentary agricultural area took advantage of the political
vacuum to move
into the richer lands. Among these peoples were the Toltecs who
established a
capital at Tula in about 968. They adopted many cultural features
from the
sedentary peoples, to which they added a strongly militaristic
ethic. This
included the cult of sacrifice and war that is often portrayed in
Toltec art.
Later Mesoamerican peoples, such as the Aztecs, had some historical
memory of
the Toltecs and thought of them as culture heroes, the givers of
civilization.
Thus, being able to trace one's lineage back to the Toltecs later
became a
highly prized pedigree. The archeological record, however, indicates
that
Toltec accomplishments were often fused or confused with those of
Teotihuacan
in the memory of the Toltec's successors.
The Toltec Heritage
Among the legends that survived about the Toltecs were those of
Topiltzin, a Toltec leader and apparently a priest dedicated to the
god
Quetzalcoatl (the Feathered Serpent) who later became confused with
the god
himself in the legends. Apparently, Topiltzin, a religious reformer,
was
involved in a struggle for priestly or political power with another
faction.
When he lost, Topiltzin and his followers went into exile, promising
to return
in the future to claim his throne on the same date according to the
cyclical
calendar system. Supposedly, Topiltzin and his followers sailed for
Yucatan;
there is considerable evidence of Toltec influence in that region.
The legend
of Topiltzin-Quetzalcoatl was well known to the Aztecs and may have
influenced
their response when the Europeans later arrived.
The Toltecs created an empire that extended over much of central
Mexico,
and their influence spread far beyond the region. Although the Maya
had
abandoned many cities and no longer kept long-count dates, large
cities,
especially in Yucatan, were still occupied. Around A.D. 1000,
Chichen Itza was
conquered by Toltec warriors, and it and a number of other cities
were then
ruled for a long time by central Mexican dynasties or by Maya rulers
under
Toltec influence. The architecture at Chichen Itza - with its
pyramid of the
god Quetzalcoatl (Feathered Serpent) and artistic motifs of
warriors,
feathered serpents, and the symbols of death - reflects the Toltec
influence.
Some Maya states in Guatemala, such as the Quiche kingdom, also had
Toltecized
ruling families.
Toltec influence spread northward as well. Obsidian mines were
exploited
in northern Mexico, and the Toltecs may have traded for turquoise in
the
American Southwest. There is evidence of contact between Mesoamerica
and the
cliff-dwellers of Colorado and New Mexico, who are the ancestors of
the modern
Pueblo Indians of the Southwest. It has been suggested that the
great Anasazi
adobe town at Chaco canyon in New Mexico was abandoned when the
Toltec Empire
fell and the trade for local turquoise ended.
How far eastward that influence spread is a matter of dispute. Was
there
contact between Mesoamerica and the elaborate culture and
concentrated towns
of the Hopewell peoples of the Ohio and Mississippi valleys
discussed in
Chapter 9? Scholars disagree. Eventually, in the lower Mississippi
valley from
about 700, elements of Hopewell culture seem to have been enriched
by external
contact perhaps with Mexico. This Mississippian culture, which
flourished
between 1200 and 1500, was based on maize and bean agriculture.
Towns, usually
located along rivers, had stepped temples made of earth and
sometimes large
burial mounds. Some of the burials include well-produced pottery and
other
goods and seem to be accompanied by ritual executions or sacrifices
of
servants or wives. This indicates social stratification in the
society.
Cahokia, near East St. Louis, Illinois, covered five square miles
and may have
had over 30,000 people in and around its center. Its largest earthen
pyramid,
called Monk's Mound, covers 15 acres and is comparable in size to
the largest
classic period pyramids in Mexico. Many of these cultural features
seem to
suggest contact with Mesoamerica, although no definitely Mexican
object has
been found in a Mississippian site. Still, certain artistic traits
and
subjects, including the feathered serpent, strongly suggest contact.
The Aztec Rise To Power
The Toltec Empire lasted until about 1150, at which time it was
apparently destroyed by nomadic invaders from the north who also
seem to have
sacked Tula around that date. In the period after the fall of Tula,
the center
of population and political power in central Mexico shifted to the
valley of
Mexico and especially to the shores of the large chain of lakes in
that basin.
The three largest lakes were connected by marshes; together they
provided a
rich aquatic environment. While the eastern lakes tended to be
brackish from
the minerals that emptied in them from surrounding rivers, the
southern and
western portions contained fresh water. The shores of the lakes were
dotted
with settlements and towns. A dense population lived around the
lakes to take
advantage of their life-giving water for agriculture, the fish and
aquatic
plants and animals, and the advantages of transportation. Of the
approximately
3000 square miles in the basin of the valley, about 400 square miles
were
underwater.
The lakes became the cultural heartland and population center of
Mexico
in the postclassic period. In the unstable world of post-Toltec
Mesoamerica,
various peoples and cities jockeyed for supremacy of the lakes and
the
advantages they offered. The winners of this struggle, the Aztecs,
eventually
built a great empire, but when they emerged on the historical scene
they were
the most unlikely candidates for power.
From their obscure origins, the Aztec (or as they called themselves,
the
Mexica) rise to power and formation of an imperial state was as
spectacular as
it was rapid. According to some of their legends, the Mexica had
once
inhabited the central valley and had known agriculture and the
"civilized"
life but had lived in exile to the north in a place called Aztlan
(from whence
we get the name Aztec). This may be an exaggeration by people who
wished to
lay claim to a distinguished heritage. Other sources indicate that
the Aztecs
were simply one of the nomadic tribes that used the political
anarchy,
following the fall of the Toltecs, to penetrate into the area of
sedentary
agricultural peoples. Like the ancient Egyptians, the Aztecs rewrote
history
to suit their purposes. Their ruler Itzcoatl (1427-1440) ordered all
the old
books destroyed and had history rewritten in a manner more favorable
to the
Aztec "official" version. Later observers, both Spaniards and
Indians, wrote
with their own biases. Thus, it is difficult to piece the story
together and
to eliminate intentional bias, political manipulation, and later
rewriting,
but with the help of archeology and ethnohistory, or the use of
anthropological techniques by historians, it is possible to outline
the major
features of Aztec life and history.
What seems clear is that the Aztecs were a group of about 10,000
people
who migrated to the shores of Lake Texcoco in the central valley of
Mexico
around the year 1325. After the fall of the Toltec Empire, the
central valley
was inhabited by a mixture of peoples - Chichimec migrants from the
northwest
and various groups of sedentary agriculturalists. These peoples were
divided
into small political units that claimed greater or lesser authority
on the
basis of their military power and their connections to Toltec
culture or
Toltec descendants. Many of these peoples spoke Nahuatl, the
language the
Toltecs had spoken. The Aztecs too spoke this language, a fact that
made their
rise to power and their eventual claims to legitimacy more
acceptable.
In this period the area around the lake was dominated by a number of
tribes organized into city-states. The city of Azcapotzalco was the
real power
but was challenged by an alliance centered in the city of Texcoco.
Another
city, Culhuacan, which had been part of the Toltec Empire, used its
heritage
as legitimate heir to the Toltecs as a means of creating alliances
by marrying
its princes and princesses to more powerful but less distinguished
states.
This was a world of political manuever and state marriages,
competing powers
and shifting alliances.
An intrusive and militant group, such as the Aztecs, were distrusted
and
disliked by the dominant powers of the area, but their fighting
skills could
be put to use, and this made them attractive as mercenaries or
allies. For
about a century the Aztecs wandered around the shores of the lake,
being
allowed to settle for a while and then driven out by more powerful
neighbors.
An alliance with Culhuacan failed when instead of arranging a royal
marriage
of a princess sent from that city, the Aztecs executed her as an
offering to
their gods.
In a period of militarism and warfare, the Aztecs had a reputation
as
tough warriors and fanatical followers of their gods, to whom they
offered
continual human sacrifices. This reputation made them both valued
and feared.
Their own legends foretold that their wanderings would end when they
saw an
eagle perched on a cactus with a serpent in its beak. Supposedly,
this sign
was seen on a marshy island in Lake Texcoco and there, on that
island and one
nearby, the Aztecs settled. The city of Tenochtitlan was founded
about 1325
and on the neighboring island the city of Tlatelolco was established
shortly
thereafter. The two cities eventually grew together, although they
maintained
separate administrations.
From this secure base the Aztecs began to take a more active role in
regional politics. Azcapotzalco and Texcoco were locked in a
struggle, and the
Aztecs now began to serve Azcapotzalco as mercenaries. This alliance
brought
prosperity to the Aztecs, especially to their ruler and the warrior
nobility,
which was now acquiring lands and tribute from conquered towns. By
1428,
however, the Aztecs had rebelled against Azcapotzalco and had joined
with
Texcoco in destroying it. From that victory the Aztecs emerged as an
independent power. In 1434, Tenochtitlan, Texcoco, and a smaller
city,
Tlacopan, joined together in a triple alliance that exercised
control over
much of the central plateau. Nezhualcoyotl, the philosopher king in
Texcoco
(1434-1472), used his personal prestige and political wisdom to keep
some
balance in the alliance, but in reality, Tenochtitlan and the Aztecs
dominated
their allies and controlled the major share of the tribute and lands
taken.
The Aztec Social Contract
According to the Aztec accounts of this history, a social and
political
transformation had also taken place. Acampichtli, the first ruler,
had created
a nobility, or pipiltin, from the leading families by marriage with
some
Culhuacan nobles who could trace their roots to the Toltecs. When
the war with
Azcapotzalco broke out, the commoners were reluctant to fight; but
the
nobility urged them on and promised victory. According to the Aztec
official
version, the pipiltin promised to obey the commoners forever if they
lost, and
the commoners made a similar promise if the nobles could bring
victory. The
conquest of Azcapotzalco assured the position of the nobility.
Moreover, the
ruler of Tenochtitlan emerged from this process no longer as a
spokesman for a
general council, but as a supreme ruler with wide powers. Succeeding
rulers
expanded that power and the boundaries of Aztec control. Moctezuma I
(1440-1469) conquered areas around the central plateau. Under his
brother
Ahuitzotl (1486-1502), the empire reached its greatest extent - from
coast to
coast and with some subject areas far to the south, although the
Tarascan
kingdom to the northwest remained independent. Moctezuma II
(1502-1520)
consolidated the conquest of central Mexico, and although a few
independent
states remained within central Mexico, Aztec domination extended
from the
Tarascan frontier southward to the Maya area. Subject peoples were
forced to
pay tribute, surrender lands, and sometimes do military service for
the
growing Aztec Empire.
Whatever the official explanation of events, it seems clear that
Aztec
society had been transformed in the process of expansion and
conquest. From a
loose association of clans, the Mexica had become a stratified
society under
the authority of a supreme ruler of great power. A central figure in
these
changes was Tlacaelel, a man who served as a sort of prime minister
and
advisor under three rulers from 1427 to his death around 1480. Under
his
direction, the histories were rewritten and the Mexica were given a
self-image
as a people chosen to serve the gods. Human sacrifice, long a part
of
Mesoamerican religion, was greatly expanded under his direction into
a cult of
enormous proportions in which the military class played a central
role as
suppliers of war captives to be used as sacrificial victims.
Supposedly, at
the dedication of the great temple during the reign of Ahuitzotl,
over 10,000
victims were put to death. It was also a policy of Tlacaelel to
leave a few
territories unconquered so that periodic "flower wars" could be
staged in
which both sides could obtain captives for sacrifice. Whatever the
religious
motivations of this cult, Tlacaelel and the Aztec rulers manipulated
it as an
effective means of political terror. By the time of Moctezuma II,
the Aztec
state was dominated by a king who represented civil power and served
as a
representative of the gods on earth. The cult of human sacrifice and
conquest
was united with the political power of the ruler and the nobility.
Religion And The Ideology Of Conquest
Aztec religion incorporated many features that had long been part of
the
Mesoamerican system of beliefs. Religion was a vast, uniting, and
sometimes
oppressive force in which little distinction was made between the
world of the
gods and the natural world. The traditional deities of Mesoamerica -
the gods
of rain, fire, water, corn, the sky, and the sun, many of whom were
worshiped
as far back as the time of Teotihuacan - were known and venerated
among the
Aztecs. There were at least 128 major deities, but the number of
gods, in
fact, seemed innumerable for often each deity had a female consort
or feminine
form. This was because a basic duality was recognized in all things.
Moreover,
gods might have different forms or manifestations somewhat like the
avatars of
the Hindu deities. Often each god had at least five aspects, each
associated
with one of the cardinal directions and the center. Certain gods
were thought
to be the patrons of specific cities, ethnic groups, or occupations.
It was an
extensive pantheon supported by a round of yearly festivals and a
highly
complex ceremonialism that involved various forms of feasting and
dancing
along with penance and sacrifice.
This bewildering array of gods can be organized into three major
themes
or cults. The first were the gods of fertility and the agricultural
cycle,
such as Tlaloc, or the god of rain (called Chac by the Maya), and
the gods and
goddesses of water, maize, and fertility. Xipe Totec, for example,
represented
agricultural rebirth. His cult was horrible. Victims sacrificed to
him were
flayed, and a priest then donned the skin to represent the new
growth of the
maize. A second theme centered on the creator deities, the great
gods and
goddesses who had brought the universe into being. The story of
their actions
played a central role in Aztec cosmography. Tonatiuh, the warrior
god of the
sun, and Tezcatlipoca, the god of the night sky, were among the most
powerful
and respected gods among the peoples of central Mexico. Much of
Aztec abstract
and philosophical thought was devoted to the theme of creation.
Finally, the
cult of warfare and sacrifice built on the preexisting Mesoamerican
traditions
that had been expanding since Toltec times but which, under the
militaristic
Aztec state, became the cult of the state. Huitzilopochtli, the
Aztec tribal
patron, became the central figure of this cult, but it included
Tezcatlipoca,
Tonatiuh, and other gods as well.
The Aztecs revered the great traditional deities - such as Tlaloc
and
Quetzalcoatl, the ancient god of civilization - so holy to the
Toltecs, but
their own tribal deity Huitzilopochtli became paramount. The Aztecs
identified
him with the old sun god, and they saw him as a warrior in the
daytime sky
fighting to give life and warmth to the world against the forces of
the night.
In order to carry out that struggle, the sun needed strength - and
just as the
gods had sacrificed themselves for humankind, the nourishment the
gods needed
most was that which was most precious, human life in the form of
hearts and
blood. The great temple of Tenochtitlan was dedicated to both
Huitzilopochtli
and Tlaloc. The tribal deity of the Aztecs and the ancient
agricultural god of
the sedentary peoples of Mesoamerica were thus united.
In fact, while human sacrifice had long been a part of Mesoamerican
religion, it had expanded considerably in the postclassic period of
militarism. Warrior cults and the militaristic images of jaguars and
eagles
devouring human hearts were characteristic of Toltec art. The Aztecs
simply
took an existing tendency and carried it to an unprecedented scale.
Both the
types and frequency of sacrifice increased, and a whole symbolism
and ritual,
which included ritual cannibalism, developed as part of the cult.
How much of
Aztec sacrifice was the result of religious conviction and how much
was
imposed as a tactic of terror and political control by the rulers
and the
priest class is a question still open to debate (see "Analysis" in
this
chapter).
Beneath the surface of this polytheism, there was, however, also a
sense
of spiritual unity. Nezhualcoyotl, the king of Texcoco, composed
hymns to the
"lord of the close vicinity," an invisible creative force that
supported all
the gods. Yet, his conception of a kind of monotheism, much like
that of
Pharaoh Akhnaten in Egypt, was too abstract and never gained great
popularity.
While the bloody aspects of Aztec religion have gained much
attention, we
must also realize that the Aztecs concerned themselves with many of
the great
religious and spiritual questions that have preoccupied other
civilizations:
Is there life after death? What is the meaning of life? What does it
mean to
live a good life? Do the gods really exist?
Nezhualcoyotl, whose poetry survived in oral form and was written
down in
the 16th century, wondered about life after death:
Do flowers go to the land of the dead?
In the Beyond, are we dead or do we still live?
Where is the source of light, since that which gives life hides
itself?
He also wondered about the existence of the gods:
Are you real, are you fixed?
Only You dominate all things
The Giver of Life.
Is this true?
Perhaps, as they say, it is not true.
Aztec religious art and poetry is filled with images of flowers,
birds,
and song - all of which the Aztecs greatly admired - as well as
human hearts
and blood - the "precious water" needed to sustain the gods. It is
this
mixture of images that makes the symbolism of Aztec religion so
difficult for
modern observers to understand.
Aztec religion depended on a complex mythology that explained the
birth
and history of the gods and their relation to peoples and on a
religious
symbolism that infused all aspects of life. As we have seen, the
Mesoamerican
calendar system was religious in nature, and many ceremonies
coincided with
particular points in the calendar cycle. Moreover, the Aztecs also
believed in
a cyclical view of history and believed that the world had been
destroyed four
times before and would be destroyed again. Thus there was a certain
fatalism
in Aztec thought and a premonition that, eventually, the sacrifices
would be
insufficient and the gods would again bring catastrophe.
Characteristically,
at the end of each 52-year cycle, all the fires in the kingdom were
extinguished, and while the people waited apprehensively, the
priests
attempted to kindle a new fire in the chest cavity of a sacrificial
victim. If
the gods approved and the sparks caught, the world would continue;
the new
fire was then taken by runners with torches to relight all the fires
in the
realm.
The Foundation Of Heaven: Tenochtitlan, The Great City
The city-state with its ruler-spokesman was a key central Mexican
concept
and it applied to Tenochtitlan, the Aztec capital. The Mexica
thought of
themselves as inheritors of Toltec traditions and of their city as
the new
Tula. From its modest beginnings, Tenochtitlan became a great
metropolis, with
a central zone of palaces and whitewashed temples surrounded by
adobe brick
residential districts, smaller palaces, and markets. The temple
precinct was
dominated by the great pyramid and twin temple of Huizilopochtli and
Tlaloc.
(This has recentdy been excavated by archeologists.) The round
temple of
Quetzalcoatl, the school for the priesthood, and some seventy other
buildings
stood in or near the precinct. The craftsmanship and architecture
was
outstanding. Hernan Cortes, the Spanish conqueror who viewed the
city,
personally reported, "The stone masonry and the woodwork are equally
good,
they could not be bettered anywhere." There were gardens and a zoo
kept for
the ruler. The nobility had houses two stories high, sometimes with
gardens on
the roofs.
Tlatelolco, at first a separate island city, was eventually
incorporated
as part of Tenochtitlan. It too had impressive temples and palaces,
and its
large market remained the most important place of trade and
exchange. Building
projects by various Mexican rulers increased the size and beauty of
the city.
By 1519, the city covered about five square miles. It had a
population of
150,000, larger than contemporary European cities such as Seville or
Paris.
Its island location gave Tenochtitlan a peculiar character. Set in
the
midst of a lake, the city was connected to the shores by four broad
causeways.
Since the city was built on an island and reclaimed land, it was
crisscrossed
by canals that allowed the constant canoe traffic on the lake access
to the
city. Away from the center of the city, households practiced
floating garden,
or chinampa, cultivation within the city. Each of the more than 60
city wards
was controlled by a calpulli, or kin group, and each maintained its
neighborhood temples and civic buildings. The city was supplied
primarily by
canoe transportation, although there were aqueducts that brought in
fresh
water. A dike had been constructed to keep the brackish waters of
the eastern
portion of the lake away from the agriculture in and around the
city. There
were smaller island communities and along the shores of the lake
were other
densely populated towns and cities. The structural achievement was
impressive.
A Spanish foot-soldier who saw it in 1519 wrote:
Gazing on such wonderful sights, we did not know what to say, or
whether
what appeared before us was real, for on one side, on the land,
there
were great cities, and in the lake ever many more, and the lake was
crowded with canoes, and in the causeway were many bridges at
intervals,
and in front of us stood the great city of Mexico. . . .
Such vivid descriptions by Western observers tell only a portion of
the
story. Tenochtitlan had an internal organization that reproduced the
Aztec
religious and social universe. Its four causeways were associated
with the
four cardinal directions and the gods of each. Within the city,
neighborhoods
were organized in pairs of 20 communal corporate groups and in a
number of
temple upkeep groupings, each with its neighborhood temple and
school to
maintain. The round of festivals, the calendar system, and the
cosmology of
Aztec religion was represented physically by the city's organization
and the
place and hierarchy of the corporate groups within it. Such
groupings were
based on occupations, residence, or ethnicity. This last grouping
was
important because Tenochtitlan and the Aztecs themselves had
included large
non-Aztec ethnic populations even in their origins. In fact, much of
Aztec
myth and official history was designed to create a unified people
out of an
agglomeration of groups.
Tenochtitlan was the heart of an empire and drew tribute and support
from
its allies and dependents, but in theory it was still just a
city-state ruled
by a headman, just like the other 50 or more city-states that dotted
the
central plateau. Even so, the Aztecs called it the "foundation of
heaven," the
basis of their might. It was a great world city, but unlike Rome or
Athens, it
was later so completely obliterated that even in the lifetime of its
conquerors, one of them could lament that "all is overthrown and
lost, nothing
left standing." Present-day Mexico City rises on the site of the
former Aztec
capital.
[See Aztec Sacrifice: Human sacrifice existed among many
Mesoamerican peoples,
but the Aztecs apparently expanded its practice for political
reasons and
religious belief.]
Feeding The People: The Economy Of The Empire
Feeding the great population of Tenochtitlan and the Aztec
confederation
in general depended on traditional forms of agriculture and on
innovations
developed by the Aztecs. Lands of conquered peoples were often
appropriated,
and food was sometimes demanded as tribute. In fact, the quantities
of maize,
beans, and other foods brought into Tenochtitlan annually were
staggering. In
and around the lake, however, the Aztecs adopted an ingenious system
of
irrigated agriculture by constructing chinampas for agriculture.
These were
beds of aquatic weeds, mud, and earth that had been placed in frames
made of
cane and rooted to the lake floor. They formed artificial floating
islands
about five meters long and 30 to 100 meters wide. This narrow,
striplike
construction allowed the water to reach all the plants, and willow
trees were
also planted at intervals to give shade and help fix the roots. Much
of the
land of Tenochtitlan itself was chinampa in origin, and in the
southern end of
the lake over 20,000 acres of chinampas were constructed.
The yield from chinampa agriculture was high and four corn crops a
year
were possible. Apparently, this system of irrigated agriculture had
been used
in preclassic days, but a rise in the level of the lakes had made it
impossible to continue. After 1200, however, lowering of the lake
levels once
again stimulated chinampa construction, which the Aztecs carried out
on a
grand scale. They also constructed dikes to close off the fresh
waters in the
southern and western parts of the lake from the brackish waters
elsewhere.
Today, the floating gardens of Xochimilco represent the remnants of
the lake
agriculture.
Production by the Aztec peasantry and tribute provided the basic
foods.
In each Aztec community the local clan apportioned the lands, some
of which
were also set aside for support of the temples and the state. In
addition,
individual nobles might also have private estates that were worked
by servants
or slaves from conquered peoples. Each community had periodic
markets -
according to various cycles in the calendar system such as every
five and 13
days - in which a wide variety of goods were exchanged. Cacao beans
and gold
dust were sometimes used as currency, but much trade was done as
barter. The
great market at Tlatelolco operated daily and was controlled by the
special
merchant class, or pochteca, which specialized in long-distance
trade in
luxury items such as plumes of tropical birds and cacao. The markets
were
highly regulated and under the control of inspectors and special
judges.
Despite the existence and importance of markets, this was not a
market economy
as we usually understand it.
The state controlled the use and distribution of many commodities
and
served to redistribute the vast levies of tribute received from
subordinate
peoples. Tribute levels were assigned according to whether the
subject peoples
had accepted Aztec rule or had fought against it. Those who
surrendered paid
less. Tribute payments, such as food, slaves, and sacrificial
victims, served
political and economic ends and a wide variety of commodities. Over
120,000
mantles of cotton cloth alone were collected as tribute each year
and sent to
Tenochtitlan. The Aztec state redistributed these goods. After the
original
conquests, it rewarded its nobility richly, but the commoners
received far
less. Still, the redistribution of many goods by the state
interfered with the
normal functioning of the market and created a peculiar
state-controlled mixed
economy.
|